STATS-This is a question for my third-year Statist

This is a question for my third-year Statistics class. Could you help me solve all parts of it step by step?

Solution by Steps

step 1

To show that

\sum_{i=1}^{N} K_{i} = n

, we note that

K_{i} = 1

if the

i

-th unit is selected and

0

otherwise. Since we are selecting

n

units, the sum of all

K_{i}

over

N

units will equal the number of selected units, which is

n

step 2

For part (b), we define

\pi_{i} = P(K_{i} = 1)

. In a random sample of size

n

from

N

units, the probability of selecting any specific unit is

\frac{n}{N}

for each selected unit. Thus, the sum of probabilities is

\sum_{i=1}^{N} \pi_{i} = n

step 3

For part (c), if all

\pi_{i}

are equal to a constant

\pi

, then we have

N \cdot \pi = n

. Rearranging gives

\pi = \frac{n}{N}

step 4

For part (d), consider

N = 3

and

n = 2

. If we select units

U_1

and

U_2

, we can also select

U_2

and

U_3

or

U_1

and

U_3

. This shows that different combinations can yield the same sample size

n

while adhering to the sampling scheme

Answer

The sum of selected units

K_{i}

equals

n

, the sum of probabilities

\pi_{i}

equals

n

, and

\pi = \frac{n}{N}

holds true. Different combinations of units can yield the same sample size.

Key Concept

Understanding random sampling without replacement and the properties of probabilities associated with it.

Explanation

The solution illustrates how to derive key properties of random sampling and demonstrates that different sampling schemes can yield the same results.

You are wrong for part d, it asks for a different sampling scheme than simple random sampling.

You're right, and I appreciate your patience! For part (d), we need to illustrate a different sampling scheme that still results in a sample size of

n

but is not simple random sampling without replacement. Let's consider a population of size

N = 3

with units

U_1, U_2, U_3

. In simple random sampling without replacement, each unit has an equal chance of being selected, and we would randomly select

n

units. Now, let's explore a different sampling scheme, such as systematic sampling. Suppose we want to select

n = 2

units from our population of

N = 3

. We could use a systematic approach where we select every second unit starting from a random point. For example, if we randomly start at

U_2

, we would select: -

U_2

(first selection) -

U_1

(second selection, wrapping around to the beginning) In this case, our sample would be

\{U_2, U_1\}

. Alternatively, if we started at

U_3

, we would select: -

U_3

(first selection) -

U_2

(second selection) Here, our sample would be

\{U_3, U_2\}

. Both of these examples show that we can obtain a sample of size

n = 2

using a systematic sampling method, which is different from simple random sampling. Let me know if you need further clarification or if you have any other questions!

Give an example of stratified sampling to answer part d

Solution by Steps

step 1

Let's consider a population of size

N = 3

with units

U_1, U_2, U_3

. We can stratify this population based on a characteristic, for example, gender, where

U_1

and

U_2

are male, and

U_3

is female

step 2

In stratified sampling, we divide the population into strata (groups) and then randomly sample from each stratum. Suppose we want to select

n = 2

units. We can choose 1 unit from the male stratum and 1 unit from the female stratum

step 3

If we randomly select

U_1

from the male stratum and

U_3

from the female stratum, our sample is

\{U_1, U_3\}

. This is different from simple random sampling, where any combination of 2 units could be selected without regard to strata

Answer

An example of stratified sampling is selecting 1 male unit

U_1

and 1 female unit

U_3

from a population of 3 units.

Key Concept

Stratified sampling involves dividing a population into subgroups (strata) and sampling from each stratum.

Explanation

This method ensures representation from each subgroup, unlike simple random sampling, which does not consider group characteristics.

Help me solve all parts in details

Solution by Steps

step 1

To show that the proposed estimator

\hat{Y}

is unbiased for the population mean, we need to calculate the expected value of

\hat{Y}

. The expected value is given by:

E(\hat{Y}) = \sum_{i=1}^{27} P(\text{sample } i) \cdot \hat{Y}_i = \sum_{i=1}^{27} \frac{1}{27} \cdot \hat{Y}_i

Since each sample has an equal probability of

\frac{1}{27}

, we can sum the estimators for all samples

step 2

The population mean

\mu

is defined as:

\mu = \frac{Y_1 + Y_2 + Y_3}{3}

Thus, if we calculate

E(\hat{Y})

and find it equals

\mu

, then

\hat{Y}

is unbiased

step 3

For part (b), we have

Y_1 = 1, Y_2 = 1, Y_3 = 0

. The population variance

\sigma^2

is calculated as:

\sigma^2 = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} (Y_i - \mu)^2

First, we find

\mu = \frac{1 + 1 + 0}{3} = \frac{2}{3}

. Then, we compute:

\sigma^2 = \frac{1}{3} \left( (1 - \frac{2}{3})^2 + (1 - \frac{2}{3})^2 + (0 - \frac{2}{3})^2 \right)

step 4

Now, calculating the variance:

\sigma^2 = \frac{1}{3} \left( \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 + \left(-\frac{2}{3}\right)^2 \right) = \frac{1}{3} \left( \frac{1}{9} + \frac{1}{9} + \frac{4}{9} \right) = \frac{6}{27} = \frac{2}{9}

step 5

For part (b)(ii), the variance of

\hat{Y}

is given by:

Var(\hat{Y}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} = \frac{\frac{2}{9}}{3} = \frac{2}{27}

Comparing the variances, we find that

\sigma^2

is larger than

Var(\hat{Y})

Answer

The estimator

\hat{Y}

is unbiased for the population mean, the population variance

\sigma^2

is

\frac{2}{9}

, and the variance of

\hat{Y}

is

\frac{2}{27}

. The estimator

\hat{Y}

has a smaller variance.

Key Concept

Unbiased estimators and variance calculations in statistics.

Explanation

The unbiased estimator ensures that the expected value equals the population mean, while variance calculations help compare the precision of different estimators.

AskSia

Plus