One problem with a bivariate pdf f(x, y) is that you can’t really “see” the distribuons of the individual variables unless you integrate out a variable. For example, to get f(x) you’d have to integrate out y from f(x,y).
A gentleman called Sarmanov came up with a very clever bivariate density in which the pdfs of the individual variables are directly visible. He defined:
𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑓(𝑥)𝑓(𝑦)[1 + 𝜔𝑔(𝑥)𝑔(𝑦)]
where the funcons 𝑔 (. ) have the property that:
𝑓(𝑢)𝑔(𝑢)𝑑𝑢 = 0
for i = 1, 2 and the parameter ω is such that 1 + 𝜔𝑔(𝑥)𝑔(𝑦) ≥ 0 for all x and y. Clearly for ω=0, x and y are independent so ω has something to do with dependence between x and y. The subscripts indicate that these can all be different funcons, i.e. x can have a Normal distribuon and y a Cauchy distribuon.
1.Show that f(x,y) is nonnegave and integrates to 1 when you integrate over both x and y. Conclusion: this is indeed a proper bivariate pdf.
2. What is f(y|x)?
3. Give an expression for E(y | x).
4. If x and y have Normal distribuons, then their pdf is 𝑓(𝑥) = exp (− 𝑥). Can you √
find a funcon g(x) that has the required property noted above? If so, you’ve just found a bivariate pdf with Normal pdfs for the individual variables. Note: this is not an easy problem because of the demand that 1 + 𝜔𝑔(𝑥)𝑔(𝑦) ≥ 0 for at least some values of ω...