Sure, let's break down the two-stage Stackelberg duopoly market game scenario step by step.
In the first stage, firm 1 will choose its output level knowing that firm 2 will observe this and then decide on its own output level in the second stage. Firm 1 acts as the leader in this scenario.
To derive the best response of firm 2 in stage 2, we need to consider firm 1's output choice in stage 1. Firm 2 will choose its output level to maximize its profits given firm 1's output decision.
If firm 1 chooses to accommodate entry, firm 2 will adjust its output level accordingly to maximize its profits. We can calculate the outputs and profits of both firms based on this decision, as well as the resulting market price.
To derive firm 1's limit output as a function of firm 2's actions, we need to analyze how firm 1's output changes in response to firm 2's decisions. This will help us understand the strategic interactions between the two firms.
Calculating firm 1's output if it were a monopoly involves determining the output level that maximizes firm 1's profits without considering competition from firm 2.
To solve for the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of the game, we need to find the strategy profile where both firms are making optimal decisions at every stage of the game.
Finally, exploring the effects of a government subsidy or investment policy on market outcomes involves analyzing how such interventions can impact the strategic behavior of the firms and the overall market equilibrium.
I hope this breakdown helps you understand the process better. Let me know if you have any specific questions or need further clarification on any of these points.