6. Consider a clinical trial evaluating a new talking therapy intervention, del...
Jun 5, 2024
Solution by Steps
step 1
Define the outcome variable for the i-th participant in arm k of the trial as yik
step 2
Let xik be an indicator variable that equals 1 if participant i is in the intervention arm and 0 otherwise
step 3
Let uj be the random effect for therapist j, where j ranges from 1 to 6
step 4
The mixed model for yik can be written as:
yik=β0+β1xik+j=1∑6ujdij+ϵik
where dij is the number of sessions delivered by therapist j to participant i, and ϵik is the residual error term
step 5
Assumptions:
1. The random effects uj are normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σu2.
2. The residual errors ϵik are normally distributed with mean 0 and variance σϵ2.
3. The random effects uj and residual errors ϵik are independent
Part (b)
step 1
The variance of yik in the intervention arm can be derived as follows:
Var(yik)=Var(β0+β1xik+j=1∑6ujdij+ϵik)
Since β0 and β1xik are fixed effects, their variances are 0
The correlation between yik and yi′k in the intervention arm is given by:
Corr(yik,yi′k)=Var(yik)Var(yi′k)Cov(yik,yi′k)Cov(yik,yi′k)=Cov(j=1∑6ujdij+ϵik,j=1∑6ujdi′j+ϵi′k)
Since ϵik and ϵi′k are independent, their covariance is 0
Given the between-therapist variance σu2=2, we need to determine the covariance between patients 2 and 3
step 2
From the data, the therapists delivering sessions to patients 2 and 3 are:
- Patient 2: Therapists 1, 5, 4
- Patient 3: (data not fully provided, assume similar structure)
step 3
Assuming the therapists for patient 3 are also 1, 5, 4, the covariance is:
Cov(y2k,y3k)=j=1∑6d2jd3jσu2=(1⋅1+1⋅1+1⋅1)⋅2=3⋅2=6
Part (d)
step 1
The formula component of the brms code to estimate the treatment effect can be written as:
bf(y∼trt+(1∣therapist))
where `trt` is the treatment indicator and `therapist` is the random effect for therapists
step 2
A criterion to decide if the treatment should be adopted in practice could be the statistical significance of the treatment effect (e.g., p-value < 0.05) and the clinical significance (e.g., effect size)
Part (e)
step 1
To minimize the variance of a patient's outcome, the allocation scheme should ensure that the same therapist delivers all treatment sessions for that patient
step 2
This minimizes the variance because it eliminates the between-therapist variance component, leaving only the residual error variance
Answer
The mixed model for the outcome variable, variance and correlation expressions, covariance calculation, brms code, and optimal allocation scheme are provided.
Key Concept
Mixed Model and Variance Calculation
Explanation
The mixed model accounts for both fixed and random effects, and the variance and correlation expressions help understand the impact of clustering due to therapists.