3. The mean annual tuition and fees in the year 2013-2014 academic year for a s...
Nov 13, 2024
Solution by Steps
step 1
The parameter being tested here is the mean tuition fees for private institutions in California
step 2
The null hypothesis (H0) is that the mean tuition fees is equal to 36,000, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean tuition fees differs from 36,000. Thus, we have:
H0:μ=36000Ha:μ=36000
step 3
This is a two-tailed test because we are checking for a difference in either direction (greater than or less than 36,000)
step 4
The t-distribution should be used here because the sample size is small (n=14) and the population standard deviation is unknown
step 5
To compute the test statistic, we use the formula:
t=s/nxˉ−μ0,
where xˉ=37900, μ0=36000, s=7200, and n=14.
Calculating gives:
t=7200/1437900−36000≈1.25
step 6
To analyze the sample data using the P-value method, we find the P-value corresponding to the calculated t-statistic. For t=1.25 with df=n−1=13, the P-value is approximately 0.12. Since this is a two-tailed test, we double the P-value: P≈0.24
step 7
The critical value for a two-tailed test at α=0.01 with df=13 is approximately ±3.23. Since 1.25 is within the range of −3.23 to 3.23, we fail to reject the null hypothesis
step 8
The conclusion is that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean tuition fees for private institutions in California differs from 36,000 at the 0.01 significance level
Answer
There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean tuition fees for private institutions in California differs from 36,000 at the 0.01 significance level.
Key Concept
Hypothesis testing involves comparing a sample statistic to a population parameter to determine if there is enough evidence to reject a null hypothesis.
Explanation
In this case, we tested whether the mean tuition fees differ from a specified value using a two-tailed t-test, and the results indicated insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.